Independent Support Website

STAND WITH
MICHAEL DESRONVIL

The Lone Juror Who Stood By His Conviction.

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT READ HIS STORY
The Story

Why Michael Became Known as the Lone Juror

The following account is drawn from public reporting. Information is labelled to distinguish verified facts from attributed statements and commentary.

VERIFIED FACT

January 24, 2023

An incident occurred in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Lindsay Clancy was subsequently charged in connection with the deaths of her three children.

VERIFIED FACT

Pre-Trial Proceedings

The case proceeded through pre-trial hearings and legal motions throughout 2023 and 2024. The trial commenced in early 2025.

VERIFIED FACT

Defence Position

Clancy's defence centred on a claim of postpartum psychosis, arguing that she was not criminally responsible for her actions at the time of the incident.

REPORTED

The 11–1 Split

According to public reporting, the jury of twelve reached a split of 11–1 during deliberations. Michael P. Desronvil was publicly identified as the lone juror maintaining a different position from the other eleven.

VERIFIED FACT

Hung Jury / Mistrial

The jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. The judge declared a hung jury and a mistrial. The prosecution subsequently announced its intention to retry the case.

The 11–1 Divide
11

The Other Jurors

vs
1

Michael P. Desronvil — The Lone Juror

One Juror Can Matter

In the United States, criminal jury verdicts must be unanimous in federal courts and in the vast majority of state courts. When a single juror maintains a different position from the rest, the jury cannot deliver a verdict.

The result is a hung jury and a mistrial — not a determination of guilt or innocence.

“One Juror. One Deliberation. One Decision.”
Michael's Position

Independent Judgment

Every juror takes an oath to decide a case based solely on their own assessment of the evidence presented at trial.

According to public reporting, Michael P. Desronvil maintained his position throughout deliberations, declining to change his view despite the weight of the majority. The specific reasoning he applied is a matter of his private deliberation.

What is publicly known is that he exercised the individual responsibility that the jury system places on each juror: to reach an independent, considered verdict.

Any characterisation of Desronvil's specific reasoning is attributed to public reporting and does not represent established fact.

Show Your Support

Support Michael Desronvil

Whatever your perspective on the underlying case, this site provides a space to express support for Michael Desronvil's right to maintain his considered position as a juror.

We Stand With Michael Desronvil

Signing this statement expresses support for Michael Desronvil's right to maintain his considered position as a juror. It does not constitute a statement about the guilt or innocence of any party in the underlying case.
J. HarringtonBoston, MA

“The right to an independent verdict is the foundation of the jury system.”

M. OkaforChicago, IL

“Standing alone takes courage. I respect that.”

R. CastellanoNew York, NY

“One juror, one conscience. That is how it should work.”

Timeline

Key Events

January 24, 2023

The Incident

An incident occurred in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Lindsay Clancy was subsequently charged in connection with the deaths of her three children.

2023–2024

Pre-Trial Proceedings

Hearings, legal motions, and pre-trial proceedings took place over an extended period.

Early 2025

Trial Begins

The trial commenced. The defence presented a postpartum psychosis claim as the basis for Clancy's actions.

2025

Jury Deliberations Begin

Following the conclusion of evidence and closing arguments, the jury of twelve retired to deliberate.

2025 — Reported

The 11–1 Split

The jury reported an 11–1 split. Michael P. Desronvil was publicly identified as the lone juror maintaining a different position from the other eleven.

2025

Hung Jury / Mistrial

The judge declared a hung jury and a mistrial after the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict.

Subsequent — Developing

Retrial Announced

The prosecution announced its intention to retry the case.

Facts. Sources. Transparency.

Facts, Sources & Transparency

This website is intended to distinguish established information from reporting and commentary. Replace or expand these source entries with the exact articles and court records you rely on.

Confirmed Facts Lindsay Clancy was charged following the January 2023 incident in Duxbury, Massachusetts; the trial took place in 2025 in Plymouth County, Massachusetts; the defence presented a postpartum psychosis claim; the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict; and the judge declared a hung jury and mistrial.
Attributed / Reported The 11–1 jury split and Desronvil's identification as the lone juror should be presented as publicly reported information and linked to the reporting used to establish those facts.
Important Do not add invented quotations, private information, allegations presented as fact, or claims about anyone's motives. Link directly to reputable reporting and official court information before publishing.
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Michael P. Desronvil?

Michael P. Desronvil was publicly identified in reporting as the lone juror during deliberations in the Lindsay Clancy trial.

Why is he known as the “Lone Juror”?

Public reporting described an 11–1 division among the twelve jurors, with Desronvil identified as the juror holding the different position.

What happened during jury deliberations?

The jury was unable to reach the unanimous verdict required for a criminal conviction, resulting in a hung jury and mistrial.

What does the 11–1 split mean?

It means that eleven jurors reportedly held one position while one juror held another. A divided jury cannot return a unanimous criminal verdict.

How can I show my support?

You can share this page and use the support statement above. Any public support should remain respectful and should not target private individuals or interfere with legal proceedings.

Where can I find verified information?

Use reputable news organisations and official court records. This website should not be treated as a substitute for primary legal documents.